🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.